A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing

In A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing, Francisco J. Urbina embarks on a rigorous examination of two pivotal doctrines within public international law: proportionality and balancing. This scholarly work delves into their implications for human rights and civil liberties, providing a critical lens through which readers can understand the complex interplay between legal principles and societal needs.

The Themes

Urbina's exploration is anchored in the tension between individual rights and collective interests, inviting readers to reflect on the ethical dimensions of legal reasoning. He scrutinises the effectiveness of proportionality as a tool for adjudicating conflicts, raising essential questions about its applicability and limitations in diverse legal contexts. The book encourages a nuanced understanding of how these doctrines operate within international human rights law, making it a vital read for legal scholars and practitioners alike.

Why Readers Love It

• Insightful Analysis: Urbina's critical approach challenges conventional understandings, prompting readers to reconsider established norms.
• Engaging Style: The author's clarity and precision make complex legal theories accessible, appealing to both experts and newcomers.
• Interdisciplinary Approach: The integration of philosophical perspectives enriches the discussion, offering a multifaceted view of legal principles.

Perfect For

This book is ideal for students, academics, and practitioners in the fields of law, human rights, and public policy. It serves as an essential resource for those interested in the evolving landscape of international law, as well as readers of Urbina's other works, which similarly engage with the intricacies of legal theory and human rights discourse.